| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 1994-04-0707:03 | djkc <djkc@blkbox.COM> | Re: ultraviolet catastrophe >
> I assume you mean the new song samples are on the netcom… |
| 1994-04-0522:00 | NEESH <MS5224%ALBNYVMS.bitnet@UACSC2.ALBANY.EDU> | ultraviolet catastrophe
i was just wondering how the ultraviolet catastrophe came up with their… |
| 1994-04-0610:32 | djkc <djkc@blkbox.COM> | Re: ultraviolet catastrophe > mike actually suggested the name. my suggestion was "Matrix 6".
>
Heh, another… |
| 1994-04-0622:36 | Pete Ashdown <pashdown@xmission.com> | Re: ultraviolet catastrophe > just a contrasting opinion: i think "technocolor" is completely lame,
> repetitive, unimaginative… |
| 1994-04-0622:51 | Dave Walker <marmoset@mail.msen.com> | Re: ultraviolet catastrophe
On Wed, 6 Apr 1994, Pete Ashdown wrote:
> > just a contrasting opinion… |
| 1994-04-0522:15 | Jon Drukman <jdrukman@us.oracle.com> | Re: ultraviolet catastrophe >i was just wondering how the ultraviolet catastrophe came up with their… |
| 1994-04-0621:24 | Jon Drukman <jdrukman@us.oracle.com> | Re: ultraviolet catastrophe dan nicholson sez:
>I haven't heard VA, so I can't… |
| 1994-04-0602:45 | Albert G. Boulanger <aboulanger@BBN.COM> | ultraviolet catastrophe
i was just wondering how the ultraviolet catastrophe came up with their… |
| 1994-04-0522:50 | Michael Wertheim <mw@sybase.com> | Re: ultraviolet catastrophe
> it's a physics thing. classical physics predicted a certain model of… |
| 1994-04-0618:44 | Dan Nicholson <8bit@vlad.bowker.com> | Re: ultraviolet catastrophe djkc |